Legal Opinion
Guido v. Hudson Transit Lines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 5, 1950No. 9956PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents a question of the measure of damages for the negligent destruction of a chattel. It is an almost perfect moot court case. The defendant’s negligence has been established by jury verdict and the finding is not contested. A collision took place on a New Jersey highway on October 4, 1946 between plaintiffs’ and defendant’s vehicles. The plaintiffs showed that because of post-war shortages -they did not succeed in'buying a new truck until two years after the accident and that their bulldozer, destroyed in the same collision, had not been replaced up to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Hayes Freight Lines, Inc. v. TarverOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- Barnes v. United Railways & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
- Graves v. Baltimore & New York Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Burrage v. Tri-State Transit Co. of LouisianaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Paul E. Repass v. Albert L. Vreeland and Leonard G. Brown, Individuals, and Vreeland & Brown, a New Jersey Partnership in the Practice of LawCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- State v. StanleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Delmar B. Dennis v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- New York Central Railroad v. ChurchillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
- Reynolds v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.