Legal Opinion
Martin Marietta Corp. v. New Jersey National Bank
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 30, 1981No. 80-2853PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
a.
This diversity case, in which the parties agree that the law of New Jersey governs, involves a dispute over 62,443 tons of sand. The plaintiff, Martin Marietta Corporation, purchased approximately 136,657 tons of sand during the last three months of 1973 from Hollander Sand Associates (“Hollander”), taking delivery on 59,189 tons and stockpiling the rest at Hollander’s facilities in Woodmansie, New Jersey. The stockpiled sand, as inventory of Hollander, was subject to a security interest held by the defendant New Jersey National Bank (“Bank”).…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Huddell v. LevinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- John T. Witherow v. The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Harry F. Stoner, and Bonnie E. Stoner, His Wife v. Presbyterian University HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Harvard v. Bushberg Bros., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.