Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Gomance

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 3, 2010No. CA 09-847PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COURTNEY HUDSON HENRY, Judge.

| Appellants Shelby and Linda Barnett appeal the trial court’s decision in favor of appellee Wanda Stafford on her complaint alleging trespass. For reversal, the Bar-netts contend that the trial court erred in finding that they had not proven their claims of adverse possession or a boundary by acquiescence. We affirm.

This case began with a complaint brought by Keith Gomance against the Barnetts to establish an easement by necessity to property owned by Gomance. The litigation evolved into a boundary-line dispute between the Barnetts and Wanda Stafford, Keith…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Slaton v. SlatonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Myers v. YinglingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Summers v. DietschCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Sharp County v. Northeast Arkansas Planning & Consulting Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  5. Fish v. BushSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  2. Cleary v. Sledge Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. Seeco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  4. McJunkins v. McJunkinsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Beck v. NevilleArizona Supreme Court · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API