Farmers National Bank of Annapolis v. Venner

These two actions were tried together before a judge of the Superior Court sitting without a jury.

The first is an action of contract by the plaintiff bank as the *533holder of a certain promissory note, against the defendants as makers, to recover the balance alleged to be due after the sale and application of the collateral. The note is dated “ New York City, May 14, 1892,” and is payable on demand after date to the order of the makers at the office of Wilson, Colston and Company, Baltimore, and is indorsed by the defendants. The writ is dated May 13, 1898, the last day before the action would…