Legal Opinion

United States Nat. Bank v. Shupak

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1918No. 3,891PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeals from District Court, Carbon County; A. C. Spencer, Judge. Action by tbe United States National Bank of Red Lodge, Montana, against Harry Shupak and Joe Kuchinski, copartners as Shupak & Kuchinski. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff and an order denying their motion for a new trial, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

In August, 1913, Harry Shupak and Joe Kuchinski executed and delivered to the Bridger State Bank their promissory note for $5,000. On the day following, the Bridger bank for value indorsed and transferred the note to the United States National Bank of Red Lodge. In April, 1914, the Red Lodge bank sent the note to the Bridger bank for collection. In June the Bridger bank sent what purported to be a note renewing the former one, but which was in fact a forgery. The genuine note was retained by the Bridger bank until January 21, 1915, when it was presented to the makers for payment. They gave…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Buhler v. LoftusMontana Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Cornish v. WoolvertonMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. German Nat. Bank v. BurnsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  4. Farmers National Bank of Annapolis v. VennerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  5. McFarland v. CutterMontana Supreme Court · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. First State Bank v. LangMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Merchants' National Bank v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Lindsey v. Keenan, Andrews AllredMontana Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Blackwelder v. Fergus Motor Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Adler v. Interstate Trust & Banking Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1933

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API