Legal Opinion

Larmay v. Hobby

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided July 27, 1955No. Civ. A. 6164PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUBB, District Judge.

This is an action brought to require defendant to make a finding that plaintiff is entitled to mother’s insurance benefits under Section 402(g) of Title 42, U.S. C.A. The answer pleads that the findings are supported by substantial evidence and therefore conclusive. There was filed as a part of the answer a certified copy of the transcript of the record including the evidence upon which the findings and decision complained of are based. Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that no genuine issue of fact exists and that the defendant is entitled to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Willapoint Oysters, Inc. v. EwingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  3. The Santissima Trinidad.Supreme Court of the United States · 1822
  4. United States v. LaLoneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  5. Lee Sing Far v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Grant v. FritzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. Hupp v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1962
  3. Dowell v. FolsomDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1957
  4. Eastman v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
  5. Turley v. CohenDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API