Legal Opinion

Lee Sing Far v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 2, 1899No. 488PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal from tbe District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWLEY, District Judge.

Appellant claims to be a native-born citizen of the United Stages. She arrived in San Francisco on June 25,1898, on the Pacific mail steamship Peru from China,' and was by *835the collector of the port denied the right to land. Thereafter a writ of habeas corpus was sued out in her behalf in the United States district court. The case, in accordance with the usual custom, was referred to Hon. E. A. Heacock, a special referee and commissioner of said court. In due time he heard the testimony, and made his report thereon to the district court, recommending that judgment of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Wong Kim ArkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Elwood v. . the Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. The OttawaSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  5. Koehler v. . AdlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Gomez v. CecenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Hughes County v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  4. Ly Shew, as Guardian Ad Litem of Ly Moon and Ly Sue Ning v. John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of State of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  5. Kind v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API