Legal Opinion
M & B Construction v. Yuba County Water Agency
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 5, 1999No. C027597PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RAYE, J.
Defendant Yuba County Water Agency (the Agency) appeals from a judgment granting plaintiff M & B Construction’s petition for writ of mandate. The trial court found the Agency lacked discretion to require that bidders on a construction project bid have a class “A” contractor’s license. It directed the Agency to allow all legally licensed contractors to bid on the project. We reverse.
Facts
The pertinent facts are undisputed. In April 1997 the Agency solicited bids pursuant to Public Contract Code section 22032, subdivision (c) for construction of the first phase of a canal and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ballard v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Domar Electric, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Inglewood-Los Angeles County Civic Center Authority v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Cal-Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Auburn Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- McIntosh v. AubryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- CD Investment Co. v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Department of Health Care Services v. Office of Administrative HearingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Great West Contractors, Inc. v. Irvine Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Construction Industry Force Account Council v. Amador Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Pacific Caisson & Shoring, Inc. v. Bernards Bros.California Court of Appeal · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.