Legal Opinion
Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 5, 2001No. CV99-12980 DDP (MCX)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INCLUDE SIX STATE-LAW COUNTERCLAIMS IN ITS SECOND AMENDED ANSWER
PREGERSON, District Judge.
This motion comes before the Court on the defendant’s motion to file a second amended answer and counterclaims. After reviewing and considering the materials submitted by the parties and hearing oral argument on July 23, 2001, the Court adopts the following order.
I. BACKGROUND
A. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., is a large Japanese automaker. Its subsidiary, plaintiff Nissan North America, Inc., markets and distributes Nissan vehicles in the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matrix Motor Co. v. Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki KaishaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Cyber-Financial.Net, Inc., Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2002
- Schultz v. The Harry S. Truman Scholarship FoundationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Simpson Strong-Tie Company Inc. v. MiTek Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021