Legal Opinion
Simpson Strong-Tie Company Inc. v. MiTek Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 5, 2021No. 5:20-cv-06957Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 SIMPSON STRONG-TIE COMPANY Case No. 20-cv-06957-VKD INC., 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 10 DISMISS v. 11 Re: Dkt. No. 23 MITEK INC., 12 Defendant. 13 14 In this action, plaintiff Simpson Strong-Tie Company Inc. (“Simpson”) asserts the 15 following claims against defendant MiTek Inc. (“MiTek”): (1) false advertising under the Lanham 16 Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(B); (2) false advertising under California Business & Professions 17 Code § 17500; (3) passing off under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.