Legal Opinion
Arizona Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Southern Pac. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 24, 1934No. 7218PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
For a proper understanding of the issue,, presented by this appeal, in which it is contended that the appellees’ rates on sugar from California points to Globe, Ariz., were unjust and unreasonable, a brief chronological survey of certain reports by the Interstate Commerce Commission will be necessary.
In Arizona Corporation Commission v. A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co. et al., 34 I. C. C. 158, 159, 160, 161, decided on May 25, 1915, the Interstate Commerce Commission reported:
“Effective November 15, 1914, rates on sugar were established to practically all Arizona points…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- The Chicago Junction CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Interstate Com. Commiss. v. B. & O. RAILROADSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Woodrich v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Louisiana Oil Refining Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- Jones v. Alton & S. R.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1934
- Pitzer Transfer Corp. v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1935
- El Paso & S. W. R. Co. v. Phelps-Dodge Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.