Legal Opinion

Woodrich v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 11, 1934No. 9860PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, as plaintiffs below, brought this action at law' to recover damages for the assessment and collection by defendant, a common carrier, of alleged unreasonable, extortionate, aud discriminatory freight rates on various intrastate shipments of sand and gravel moving between certain points on defendant’s railway in North Dakota.

After the impaneling of a jury, and before the taking of any testimony, defendant moved for a dismissal of the action upon the grounds that the complaint fails to state a cause of action, in that it contains no- allegations that the rates…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Tri-City Motor Transportation Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Northwestern Public Service Co. v. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  4. Watab Paper Co. v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
  5. Pitzer Transfer Corp. v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API