Legal Opinion
Hinton v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 14, 2003No. ED 80700PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Introduction
SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, Judge.
Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. (Proctor) and Wolverine (Massachusetts) Corporation (WMC) (collectively Appellants) appeal from a default judgment entered by the trial court on a petition filed by Bobby Hinton and Linda Hinton (collectively Respondents). We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
In September 1994, Proctor and WMC merged, with WMC becoming the surviving corporation. In September 1999, WMC changed its name to Wolverine Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. (WP&S).
In October 2000, Respondents filed a petition for personal injuries and loss of consortium based…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bueneman v. ZykanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Popular Leasing USA, Inc. v. Universal Art Corp. of New YorkMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Sears v. Dent Wizard International Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Shapiro v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Estep v. AtkinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Agnello v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- McElroy v. Eagle Star Group, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Frontenac Bank v. GB Investments, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Heintz Electric Co. v. Tri Lakes Interiors, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Snelling v. Reliance Automotive, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.