Legal Opinion

Bueneman v. Zykan

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 2001No. ED 78615PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Thomas Bueneman (Thomas) and Donna Benes Bueneman (Donna) (collectively Appellants) appeal from the summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of Ray Frankenberg (Ray) and Elizabeth Frankenberg (Elizabeth) (collectively the Frankenbergs). James Zykan (James) and Diane Zykan (Diane) (collectively the Zykans) cross-appeal from the default judgment entered by the trial court against the Zykans and in favor of Appellants. We reverse and remand.

Facts and Proceedings Below

Appellants are farmers who live outside Wright City. In 1992, the State of Missouri began…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Rice v. HodappSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. Bynote v. National Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  4. Worley v. WorleySupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. Melton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. ASARCO LLC v. Americas Mining Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
  2. Kevin M. Higgins and Sue E. Higgins v. Abigail J. Ferrari and Emmitt F. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Hinton v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Doe v. McFarlaneMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Kerth v. Polestar EntertainmentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API