Legal Opinion

Heintz Electric Co. v. Tri Lakes Interiors, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 2006No. 27129PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT S. BARNEY, Judge.

Tri Lakes Interiors, Inc. (“Appellant”) appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion to set aside default judgment pursuant to Rule 74.05(d). 1 Appellant raises two points of trial court error discussed below. We reverse and remand.

The underlying litigation involves two lawsuits arising, as best we can discern, from a lease agreement entered into by the parties and/or their assigns. Both lawsuits were filed in separate divisions of the Circuit Court of Greene County by Heintz Electric Company (“Respondent”) against Appellant.

In case number 304AC7131 (“the first…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. King General Contractors, Inc. v. Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day SaintsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Chesterfield Village, Inc. v. City of ChesterfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  4. Gibson Ex Rel. Woodall v. ElleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Joel Bianco Kawasaki Plus v. Meramec Valley BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brungard v. RISKY'S INC.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  2. Coble v. NCI Building Systems, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. First Bank of the Lake v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Heritage Warranty Insurance, RRG, Inc. v. SwineyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Nervig v. WorkmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API