Legal Opinion

Lathrop v. Sakatani

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 2006No. 27472PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

MOON, C.J.

The instant appeal is narrowly confined to whether the plaintiffs-appellants Naoto La-throp and Glenn Nobuki Murakami [hereinafter, collectively, the plaintiffs], members of Kiwi Kahala LLC (Kiwi Kahala), are entitled to record a lis pendens (i.ea notice of an action pending against real property) 1 on 4908 Kahala Avenue, Honolulu, Hawai'i (the Kahala property or the property), formerly owned by defendants-appellees Michael David Sakatani (Michael), who is also a member of Kiwi Kahala, and his spouse, Christine Marie Sakatani (Christine) [hereinafter, Michael…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  2. TSA International Ltd. v. Shimizu Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Kona Old Hawaiian Trails Group Ex Rel. Serrano v. LymanHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Wong v. Bd. of Regents, University of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Chun v. Board of TrusteesHawaii Supreme Court · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Weddell v. H2O, INC.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Hamilton Ex Rel. Lethem v. LethemHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Thorn v. WalkerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. County of Hawai'i v. Ala Loop HomeownersHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Right to Know Committee v. City CouncilHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API