Legal Opinion

Mackenzie Oil Co. v. Omar Oil & Gas Co.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided November 22, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The bill is for a receiver on the ground of insolvency under Paragraph 3883, Revised Code 1915. The defendant filed an answer denying the insolvency and denying also that the complainant is a creditor. The defendant, in addition to the filing of an answer, filed a cross bill which prays that certain notes given by the defendant company to the complainant, and. which the bill relies upon as constituting the debt to it from the defendant, may be cancelled and surrendered to the defendant because of fraud in their procurement.

After the answer and cross-bill had been filed, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. J. H. Day Co. v. Mountain City Mill Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1915
  2. F. Speidel Co. v. N. Barstow Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wise v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1935
  2. Terry v. StullCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
  3. Haas v. Sinaloa Exploration & Development Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1930
  4. Loft, Inc. v. GuthCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API