Legal Opinion
Shelby Mutual Insurance v. Williams
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 19, 1964PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The objective of this action is to determine whether the plaintiff must defend the defendants Wilhelmina A. and Raymond E. Williams, and pay any judgment which might be rendered against them, in an action arising out of an automobile accident. A confusing method of attaining that objective has been resorted to. It is undisputed that the plaintiff had issued to Wilhelmina a liability insurance policy covering an automobile owned by her. The policy insured her, any resident of her household and any person using the automobile with her knowledge and permission against liability for claims for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Holt v. WissingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Freedman v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- Redmond v. MatthiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Nowsky v. SiedleckiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
3Cited by9 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Jenkins v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- West Haven Sound Development Corp. v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Connolly v. Great Basin Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. ShernowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.