Legal Opinion
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Shernow
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 17, 1990No. 8623PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The plaintiff insurer appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of its complaint seeking a declaratory-judgment that the defendant insured is not entitled to indemnification for the damages awarded to the intervening defendant, Mary Lou Sciola, the plaintiff in an underlying civil action. The facts relating to the underlying action for assault and battery and for medical malpractice are fully set forth in Sciola v. Shernow, 22 Conn. App. 351, 577 A.2d 1081 (1990).
The defendant held an insurance policy issued by the plaintiff. The policy contained the following relevant provisions. “Insuring…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Smedley Co. v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Halpern v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Izzo v. Colonial Penn InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Bowman v. 1477 Central Avenue Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Doublewal Corp. v. ToffolonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- New London County Mutual Insurance Co. v. NantesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Edo Corp. v. Newark InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
- Edo Corp. v. Newark Ins. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
- Farm Family Casualty Insurance Co. v. SamperiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- Vermont Mutual Insurance v. CicconeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.