Bunker v. Osborn
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. J. M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
—An instrument dated February 16, 1894, purporting to be the promissory note of the Boyle Mining Company (a corporation) for three thousand dollars, besides interest, payable ninety days after date, to the order of G. W. Osborn and Alfred Gonzalez, was by the said payees, on the date of said note, duly indorsed to Wells, Fargo & Co.’s Bank (a corporation). After the said note was due, by its terms, Gonzalez paid the amount thereof to said last-named corporation. This suit was brought by the assignee of Gonzalez to enforce contribution from Osborn of one half of the amount so paid by…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Richter v. HenningsanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pacific Freight Lines v. Pioneer Express Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Booth v. FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Hurlbut v. QuigleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Gelbach v. DeweyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Jans v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.