Booth v. Friedman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
Claiming that M. S. Eisner, deceased, was at the time of his death under obligation to pay the plaintiff certain moneys, the plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants as executors of the estate of the deceased. The trial court made findings in favor of the plaintiff and a judgment in accordance with those findings was entered. From that judgment the defendants have appealed and have brought up a bill of exceptions. On the appeal the appellants attack certain findings as not being supported by the evidence. Before taking up a consideration of those attacks it is necessary to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Breeze v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Kinley v. LargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Bunker v. OsbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by8 opinions
- Niederer v. FerreiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Jackson v. LacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Berrington v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Manuel v. Hicks Iron WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Haley v. TraegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.