Legal Opinion

Goodman v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 11, 1931No. 6 Div. 784PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The suit is against a municipality to recover consequential damages resulting to an abutting property owner by reason of street improvements. Such cause of action is declared by section 235 of the Constitution of Alabama. Harris v. Town of Tarrant City, 221 Ala. 558, 130 So. 83; Birmingham v. 381, 129 So. 50.

Under plea in short by consent the city set up the proceedings for the assessment of the cost of such improvements against abutting property as res adjudicata of the issue here presented. These proceedings, conducted as per statute, resulted in an assessment of this lot, the residence lot…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Huntsville v. GudenrathSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Harris v. Town of Tarrant CitySupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Hamrick v. Town of AlbertvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Hood v. City of BessemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Stovall v. City of JasperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Jasper v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Hamrick v. Town of AlbertvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. City of Birmingham v. TerrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. City of Birmingham v. EmondSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. City of Bessemer v. SchanzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API