Legal Opinion

State v. Lilliston.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 28, 1906PublishedCited by 24 opinions

INDICTMENT for murder against Robert IT. Lilliston, beard by Judge George W. Ward and a jury, at the January Term, 1906, of the Superior Court of Wake. From a verdict of murder in tbe second degree and judgment thereon, the prisoner appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNOR and WALKER, JJ., dissenting. It was in evidence that the prisoner Lilliston and one Clark were two "fakirs" who had been attending the Raleigh Fair, and on Thursday and Friday nights they with others were at a house of ill-fame, engaged in gambling and drinking, and that a difficulty sprung up there on Friday night between these men over charges of cheating. On Saturday, 21 October, they went to the railroad station in Raleigh to take the train to leave the city, and there in the crowded reception-room they engaged in shooting at each other — the next room, separated only by a glass…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. Adams.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. State v. . RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  3. State v. . BoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  4. State v. . StarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  5. Holmes, Ex'r v. . GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. . TrottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. State v. . OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. State v. . HartsfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. State v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API