Legal Opinion
Town of Wallingford v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 8, 1994No. 14998PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.
The principal issue in this action for a declaratory judgment is whether a provision in an insur-*302anee contract excluding coverage for bodily injury claims arising out of police “activities” excludes coverage for claims based on the alleged negligence of police in operating a town jail.
The plaintiffs in this action are the town of Walling-ford and three members of the Wallingford police department.1 They sought a judgment declaring that either or both of the defendants, the Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company and the Hartford Insurance Group, are obligated to defend and indemnify them…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Missionaries of the Co. of Mary, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Hatcho Corp. v. Della PietraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Vadheim v. Continental InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Satorre v. New Hanover County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Doe v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Western World Insurance v. Reliance InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- CLARENDON NAT. INS. v. City of York, PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Avemco v. PondDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.