People v. Howton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: None of defendant’s claims on appeal from convictions of third degree possession and sale of a controlled substance requires reversal. The trial court properly allowed the undercover police officer who purchased cocaine from defendant to testify that defendant told him that he could return to buy more because the evidence was part of the criminal res gestae and was probative of defendant’s motive and intent (see, People v Molineux, 168 NY 264; People v Polk, 84 AD2d 943, 945). At trial the People established a proper chain of custody (see, People v…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- People v. McGeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. PenaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. PolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. ChavysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992