Legal Opinion

Ketchum v. Town of Dorset

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 29, 2011No. 10-165PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Plaintiffs appeal the Town of Dorset’s decision to reclassify a town road from a class 3 to a class 4 highway. Plaintiffs argue that the court erred in reviewing the selectboard’s reclassification using a deferential standard instead of a de novo procedure involving appointment of a panel of commissioners. In the alternative, plaintiffs contend that, even under a deferential standard, the court’s decision is erroneous because the findings are not supported by the evidence and they were denied an opportunity to supplement the record on appeal. We affirm.

¶ 2. Plaintiffs own property that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Richards v. Town of NorwichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Braun v. Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  3. Follo v. FlorindoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  4. Brennan v. Town of ColchesterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  5. Sagar v. Warren SelectboardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re Town Highway No. 20Supreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  2. Garbitelli v. Town of BrookfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  3. Rotman v. Progressive InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2013
  4. Luck Brothers v. Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  5. Demarest v. Town of UnderhillSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API