Legal Opinion

Richards v. Town of Norwich

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 29, 1999No. 98-074PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAmestoy, C. J.

Stuart Richards appeals a Windsor Superior Court order dismissing his Rule 75 appeal of the Town of Norwich selectboard’s decision authorizing an on-site septic system permit for Paul Nowieki. Richards argues that he alleged facts in his complaint sufficient to assert standing and, therefore, the superior court erred when it dismissed his Rule 75 action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We reverse.

In 1973, the Town of Norwich (“town”) adopted an ordinance (“1973 ordinance”) that established minimum standards regulating the design, construction and installation of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Amiot v. AmesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. Coty v. Ramsey Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. Town of Cavendish v. Vermont Public Power Supply AuthoritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. Vermont State Employees' Ass'n v. Vermont Criminal Justice Training CouncilSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. Harris v. CarbonneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Rheaume v. PallitoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  2. Powers v. Office of Child SupportSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  3. Elkins v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  4. Gilman v. Maine Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  5. Union Mutual Fire Insurance v. JoergSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API