Demarest v. Town of Underhill
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
¶ 1. Petitioners appeal from the trial court’s 2012 order upholding the Town of Underhill’s decision to reclassify a segment of Town Highway 26 (TH 26) from a Class 3 and Class 4 highway to a legal trail. Petitioners argue that: the trial court should have appointed commissioners to make a report concerning *206the reclassification decision pursuant to 19 V.S.A. §§ 740-743 rather than reviewing the reclassification decision on the record pursuant to Vermont Rule of Civil Procedure 75; the court erred in declining to stay the appeal pending resolution of a related action concerning maintenance of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re S.B.L.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- In Re Town Highway No. 20Supreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- Ketchum v. Town of DorsetSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Town of Calais v. County Road CommissionersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Hansen v. Town of CharlestonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Friends of Pine Street d/b/a Pine Street Coalition v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- David Demarest v. Town of UnderhillSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
- Demarest and Moulton v. Town of UnderhillSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Demarest v. Town of UnderhillDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2022
- Musty v. RyegateVermont Superior Court · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.