Legal Opinion

Demarest v. Town of Underhill

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 27, 2013No. 12-403PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

¶ 1. Petitioners appeal from the trial court’s 2012 order upholding the Town of Underhill’s decision to reclassify a segment of Town Highway 26 (TH 26) from a Class 3 and Class 4 highway to a legal trail. Petitioners argue that: the trial court should have appointed commissioners to make a report concerning *206the reclassification decision pursuant to 19 V.S.A. §§ 740-743 rather than reviewing the reclassification decision on the record pursuant to Vermont Rule of Civil Procedure 75; the court erred in declining to stay the appeal pending resolution of a related action concerning maintenance of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re S.B.L.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  2. In Re Town Highway No. 20Supreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  3. Ketchum v. Town of DorsetSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  4. Town of Calais v. County Road CommissionersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  5. Hansen v. Town of CharlestonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Friends of Pine Street d/b/a Pine Street Coalition v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  2. David Demarest v. Town of UnderhillSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  3. Demarest and Moulton v. Town of UnderhillSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. Demarest v. Town of UnderhillDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2022
  5. Musty v. RyegateVermont Superior Court · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API