Legal Opinion
McMaster v. City of Santa Rosa
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 31, 1972No. Civ. 29489PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KANE, J.
Plaintiffs James W. McMaster and Alice M. McMaster appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after general demurrers of City of Santa Rosa (City) and Francis Realty, Inc. (respondent) to the second amended complaint were sustained and plaintiffs failed to further amend.
The crucial and ultimate issue presented in this appeal involves the concept of procedural due process in the context of the sale of tax delinquent property.
Since appellants failed to pay their property taxes for the 1962-1963 fiscal year, ,the City, on July 5, 1968, conducted a tax sale wherein the property of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Miller v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Ramish v. HartwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chesney v. GreshamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Salinero v. PonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Township of Montville v. Block 69, Lot 10Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Philbrick v. HuffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Sonoma Subaru, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.