Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Oklahoma Trading Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1912No. 1755PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from District Court, Greer County; G. A. Brown, Judge. Action by C. P. Hamilton and H. Mathewson against the Oklahoma Trading Company and the El Reno Wholesale Grocery Company. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

This case presents error from the district court of Greer county. Plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, brought their action against defendants, praying damages in the sum of $60, with interest, alleged to have been occasioned through the negligence of defendants’ employees or servants in breaking a large plate glass in plaintiffs’ building. To this petition defendants filed a general denial, and upon the issues thus joined, a jury being waived, the cause came on for trial before the court, which rendered judgment for defendants. Motion for new trial was filed and overruled and exception…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Waters v. Pioneer Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. City of Richmond v. SitterdingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  3. Kniceley v. West Virginia Midland RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Chas. T. Derr Construction Co. v. GelruthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Holmes v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Getman-Macdonell-Summers Drug Co. v. AcostaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Barnsdall Refining Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Stricker v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API