Legal Opinion
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Martin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 12, 1914No. 3707PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Error from District Court, Caddo County; Prank M. Bailey, Judge. Action by Evan C. Martín, a minor, by his next friend, IT. L. Martin, against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
GALBRAITH, C.
The plaintiff in error appeals from a judgment in the sum of $2,500, rendered against it upon the verdict of a jury in favor of the defendant in error, in an action for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained on account of the negligent operation of one of its passenger trains. The charging part of the petition is as follows:
“Second. That on or about the 31st day of July, 1910, the plaintiff, Evan C. Martin, was at the passenger depot of the defendant railway company in the city of Chickasha, Okla., and purchased, a ticket from the agent of said company,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hanlon v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. CogswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. SpearsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Metropolitan Ry. Co. v. FonvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Getman-Macdonell-Summers Drug Co. v. AcostaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Slick Oil Co. v. CoffeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Sand Springs Railway Co. v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.