Kern Valley Bank v. Koehn
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. W. P. Laird, Rowen Irwin, E. L. Foster, and Joseph H. Tam, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal from an order refusing to dissolve an attachment.
The writ of attachment attacked was issued on October 2, 1907, in pursuance of an affidavit and undertaking filed on the same day. The action was begun on July 17, 1907, to recover of defendant the amount of a note for $5320, dated October 2, 1900, and maturing October 2, 1903.
The first ground of the motion to dissolve the attachment was that the debt sued on was secured by a lien and pledge of personal property. Affidavits and counter affidavits were filed upon the hearing. They were conflicting upon some points. We must…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. ProsserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- In re Estate of BlytheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Naftzger v. GreggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Wells v. HarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Gow v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Easton v. AshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Rougle v. TurkIdaho Supreme Court · 1955