Wells v. Harter
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff,, in the Fifteenth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Dwinelle, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court :
For the reasons set forth in the opinion of Department One, judgment and order affirmed.
Opinion of Department One referred to above.
Ross, J.:
On the 10th of May, 1869, plaintiff sold and conveyed to the defendant Bloomfield Harter certain real property. A part of the purchase-money was paid in cash, and for the balance, Harter executed to plaintiff his promissory note, dated May 10th, 1869, and payable May 10th, 1870, with interest thereon at the rate of one and one-half per cent, per month, and to secure the payment of the note, executed to plaintiff a mortgage on the premises.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McCormick v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Chabot v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by20 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. ProsserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Fontana Land Co. v. LaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- London & San Francisco Bank v. BandmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- McKeown v. CollinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
- Daniels v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.