Gow v. Marshall
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
This is an action by an attaching creditor against a garnishee, based on section 720 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
It is alleged in the complaint that on the thirteenth day of March, 1888, the plaintiff, N. W. Gow, commenced an action against H. B. Marshall to recover the sum of $1,686.78 for work and labor performed and money paid; that a summons was duly issued and served on the defendant; that a writ of attachment was also duly issued and delivered to the sheriff of the county, *566and the plaintiff then gave to the sheriff information in writing that the Centinela-Inglewood Land…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Roberts & Co. v. LandeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Robinson v. TevisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Hisler v. CarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
3Cited by17 opinions
- Dickinson v. First National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- Davis v. ClaxtonMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Yosemite Growers Co-op Ass'n v. Case-Swayne Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- Clyne v. Easton, Eldrige & Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
- Anaheim National Bank v. KraemerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.