Smith v. King of Arizona Mining & Milling Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
ERROR to the District Court of the First Judicial' District iu and for the County of Pima. George R. Davis, Judge. On appeal to the United States Supreme Court. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
The plaintiff in error brought suit in the district court of Maricopa County against the King of Arizona Mining and Milling Company, Hiram W. Blaisdell, Eugene S. Ives, Epes Randolph, John H. Morton, and S. Morgan Smith, to reform and enforce a certain contract made February 21, 1899, and to annul as fraudulent a certain writing dated August 30, 1900, executed by the defendant S. Morgan Smith in favor of the King of Arizona Mining and Milling Company. All the defendants appeared and answered to the complaint. In the answer of the defendant Blaisdell appeared a pleading which began in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Finn v. SpagnoliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Kelsey and Mintyre v. Hobby and BondSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Coburn v. Cedar Valley Land & Cattle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
3Cited by3 opinions
- Conkling v. CrosbyArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Allan v. AllanArizona Supreme Court · 1919
- Mosher v. WaylandArizona Supreme Court · 1945