Legal Opinion
Kelsey and Mintyre v. Hobby and Bond
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 19, 1842PublishedCited by 16 opinions
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the UnHed States for the district of South Carolina.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taney
This is ah appeal from the decree of the Circuit Court for the district of South Carolina. -
It appears from the record that Kelsey, MTntyre, and Hobby, for some time previous to the 9th of February, 1822, carried ou business in Georgia, as merchants, under the firm of C. Kelsey and Company; and it- having been agreed among the partners that Hobby should withdraw from the firm, they, on the day above-mentioned, entered into the following agreement:
“Articles of agreement entered into, at the dissolution of the firm of C. Kelsey and Company, between Alfred M. Hobby, of the first part, and…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Teodore Dorotee Autera v. Manuel Dudley Robinson, Anthony C. Autera v. Manuel Dudley RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Consolidated Gas Co. of New York v. NewtonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
- French v. HaySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Swift v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
- Stebbins v. NilesMississippi Supreme Court · 1852
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.