Sarter v. Siskiyou County
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
Plaintiff, who is the county surveyor of Siskiyou County, brought the action to recover $1,222 for labor and services alleged to have been performed by him as such county surveyor. The case was tried by the court upon an agreed statement of facts. Judgment was rendered in favor of defendant for its costs, from which judgment plaintiff appeals.
From the agreed statement of facts, which the court adopted as its findings, the following appears: 1. That defendant is a county of the twenty-ninth class. 2. That plaintiff, at all times mentioned in the statement, was the duly elected, qualified, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Doughterty v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Irwin v. County of YubaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- State ex rel. Holman v. RoachIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Martin v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- State ex rel. Stewart v. WoffordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kristin Perry v. Arnold SchwarzeneggerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- People Ex Rel. Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. DillonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Weaver v. First National Bank of LimonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- Madden v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.