Arnold v. Sullenger
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The respondent, as surveyor of the county of Contra Costa, commenced this proceeding in mandamus in the superior court to compel the appellant, as auditor of said county, to draw his warrant upon the county treasurer in the sum of $500 as salary due the respondent for the month of August, 1924. The appellant answered and the cause was heard .on an agreed statement of facts which are set forth in the findings. Judgment was rendered ordering the issuance of a peremptory writ, from which judgment this appeal is prosecuted on the judgment-roll.
The respondent was elected county surveyor at the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coulter v. PoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Doughterty v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Farrar v. SteenberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Galeener v. HoneycuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- People Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- County of Marin v. MessnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Dwyer v. NolteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- Ogle v. EckelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Brooks v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Application of Idaho Hospital Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.