Legal Opinion
Gray v. Wallman & Kramer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 13, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered on or about September 22,1995, which denied third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Third-party defendant Cahill Gordon & Reindel (“Cahill”), which represented defendant and third-party plaintiff Julienne Michel as the prospective buyer in an aborted real estate transaction, owed absolutely no duty to plaintiff, the proposed seller of the real property. Nor did Cahill owe defendant a special duty independent of the attorney-client…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Glamm v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Santulli v. Englert, Reilly & McHugh, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Lazzaro v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Lazzaro v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Bunker v. BunkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Svenska Finans International BV v. Scolaro, Shulman, Cohen, Lawler & Burstein, P.C.District Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Cerio v. KoldinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001