Legal Opinion

Cerio v. Koldin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 21, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ cross motions seeking dismissal of the complaint in this legal malpractice action, filed December 16, 1999, as time-barred. Contrary to the contention of plaintiff, the continuous representation rule does not warrant a different result. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendants maintained a continuous relationship with plaintiff pursuant to the retainer agreement, we conclude that the relationship ceased to exist when plaintiff retained new counsel and sent defendants’ law office a discharge letter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lazzaro v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Aaron v. Roemer, Wallens & Mineaux, L. L. P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Piliero v. Adler & StavrosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Lazzaro v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Gray v. Wallman & KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marlett v. HennessyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API