Legal Opinion

Sala v. Crane

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Lee, J.

— This case involves a boundary line between the lands of appellant and respondent in Sec. 6, T. 47 N., R. 3 W., B. M.

The United States patented to respondent, with other lands, Lots 5 and 6, and to appellant, with other lands, 'Lot 4 in said section. The boundary line in dispute is the east and west line between Lots 4 and 5, which subdivisions comprise the west half of the northwest quarter of Sec. 6, Lot 5 being the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of See. 6.

The section was officially surveyed in 1901. The survey began at the township corner between townships 47 and 48 north and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Cragin v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Ayers v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. City of Hastings v. FoxworthyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Ruddy v. RossiSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vaught v. McClymondMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Robbins v. County of BlaineIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Palmer v. FitzpatrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Case v. EricsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Smith v. LongIdaho Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API