Legal Opinion
520 East 81st Street Associates v. Lenox Hill Hospital
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 25, 1991PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the order and judgment of the Supreme Court reinstated.
Plaintiff commenced this action for a declaratory judgment to obtain relief from its obligation to offer a renewal lease to defendant Lenox Hill Hospital, the existing tenant of record, on the ground that Lenox Hill was not occupying the subject rent-stabilized apartment units as "primary residences,” but rather was subletting the units to its employees (see, L 1983, ch 403, § 41, amending Administrative Code of City of New York §…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Seawall Associates v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- MATTER OF 61 JANE ST. ASSOCS. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- 615 Co. v. MikeskaNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Crow v. 83rd Street AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rent Stabilization Ass'n of New York City, Inc. v. HigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Manocherian v. Lenox Hill HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Lanz v. FeolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Manocherian v. Lenox Hill HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1992
- Markham v. ComstockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.