Markham v. Comstock
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Petitioners, residents of North Carolina, commenced this proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7 to challenge the increase in the assessed value of their summer residence on Keuka Lake for the 1999-2000 tax year. The first cause of action alleges that the assessment is excessive; *972the second cause of action alleges that respondents acted in bad faith in increasing the assessed value of their property; and the third cause of action alleges that the school…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Port Jefferson Health Care Facility v. WingNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Cass v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Rubin v. GlaserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- City of New York v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Blooming Grove Properties, Inc. v. Board of Assessors of Blooming GroveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stanek v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Chapman v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2002