Legal Opinion

Markham v. Comstock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Petitioners, residents of North Carolina, commenced this proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7 to challenge the increase in the assessed value of their summer residence on Keuka Lake for the 1999-2000 tax year. The first cause of action alleges that the assessment is excessive; *972the second cause of action alleges that respondents acted in bad faith in increasing the assessed value of their property; and the third cause of action alleges that the school…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Port Jefferson Health Care Facility v. WingNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Cass v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Rubin v. GlaserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. City of New York v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Blooming Grove Properties, Inc. v. Board of Assessors of Blooming GroveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stanek v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Chapman v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API