Legal Opinion
In the Interest of A.P.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 28, 2001No. 10-00-00105-CVPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VANCE, Justice.
Daniel Peddicord and Natalie Conner had two children who were removed from their home by workers from the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services-Child Protective Services *253(“CPS”) after Daniel and Natalie were arrested on felonies. Daniel was later imprisoned. CPS workers believed the conditions at home endangered the children. After attempts failed over the next year to remedy these conditions, CPS filed a petition to terminate Daniel’s and Natalie’s parental rights. Natalie relinquished her rights by affidavit. Daniel proceeded to jury trial, after which…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Perez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
- In the Interest of P.E.W., II, K.M.W., and D.L.W., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
- In the Interest of T.N.F.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- In the Interest of B.L.D.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.