Overstreet v. Baxter
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Butler District Court. At the February Term, 1882, of the district court, defendants William H. Baxter and wife recovered a judgment against plaintiff Overstreet, who brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Brewer, J.:
Plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, brought his action in the district court of Butler county. Upon trial, the defendants obtained judgment, and plaintiff alleges error. So far as respects the question made by the defendants, as to the time in which the record was filed in this court, it has already been decided adversely to their contention in the cases of Osborne, Ex’r, v. Young, 28 Kas. 769; Thompson v. W. & W. Mfg. Co., 29 Kas. 476.
Turning now to the error alleged by plaintiff, the facts are these: The petition charged —
“1. That on the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thompson v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Osborne v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Eckert v. McBeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
3Cited by4 opinions
- Balduff Et Ux. v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Berger v. BierschbachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- Republic Mutual Fire Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Johnson v. BradshawNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014