Legal Opinion
Goldhofer Fahrzeugwerk GmbH & Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided January 18, 1989No. Court 82-4-00551PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
Goldhofer Fahrzeugwerk GMBH & Co., plaintiff, brings this action to contest the denial of its protest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a). The parties cross-move for summary judgment. Plaintiff claims inadequate bulletin notice of liquidation concerning its importation of a multiaxle “goose-neck” semitrailer, entry no. 101757, on February 16, 1980, at the port of Norfolk, Virginia. Plaintiff argues in the alternative that even if the bulletin notice was adequate, such notice is insufficient to meet the minimum constitutional due process requirements. The government insists…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Greene v. LindseySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Donna Kelley v. Secretary, U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Goldhofer Fahrzeugwerk Gmbh & Co. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Penrod Drilling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- Tropicana Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Samuel Aaron, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.