Legal Opinion

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Mansour-Ismail

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1999No. 99-380PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent violated DR 7-104(A)(l) by communicating directly with adverse parties represented by counsel about the subject of the representation without their counsel’s consent. As in comparable cases involving a violation of DR 7-104(A)(l), a public reprimand is an appropriate sanction. See Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Rossi (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 195, 690 N.E.2d 501; Trumbull Cty. Bar Assn. v. Makridis (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 73, 671 N.E.2d 31; Toledo Bar Assn. v. Savage (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 183, 657 N.E.2d 507. Accordingly,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. RossiOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. SavageOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Trumbull County Bar Ass'n v. MakridisOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. SartiniOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Toledo Bar Assn. v. Mansour-IsmailOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Toledo Bar Association v. Rehkopf.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API