Legal Opinion
Bowles v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 11, 1991No. 303-88LPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SMITH, Chief Judge.
After careful consideration of the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, the Plaintiff’s Motion for Declaratory Judgment Supplemental to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and the Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, hearing oral argument and an analysis of the law, the court must deny the motions.
*445FACTS
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit transferred this case to the Claims Court. Bowles v. United States Army Corps of Engrs., 841 F.2d 112 (5th Cir.1988). What follows is a brief factual summary. It is not intended to be complete.
Pla…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bowles v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Eastern Minerals International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- City National Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995