Legal Opinion
City National Bank v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 7, 1995No. 93-249LPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
Before the court after argument is plaintiffs 1 motion in limine. The issue is whether a landowner seeking damages for a taking of his property must take into account existing state and county regulatory restrictions concerning limerock mining when valuing the property prior to the date on which the United States Army Corps of Engineers denied a permit necessary to develop the property for mining.
FACTS
The following undisputed facts replicate some of the background set forth in the earlier order issued in this case, City National Bank v. United States, 30 Fed.Cl. 715 (1994),…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Sierra Club v. FlowersDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2006
- Cooley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- City National Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Daly v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003