Legal Opinion
United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 28, 1948No. Civil Action 4729-47PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLTZOFF, Associate Justice.
This is an action brought before a statutory three-judge court to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, dismissing a complaint of the United States, by which the United States sought an allowance from certain railroads for wharfage and handling services rendered in connection with shipments made by the Government during World War II at Norfolk, Viiginia. The action is brought under the Urgent Deficiencies Act, U.S.C.A., title 28, sec. 41, par. 28, and secs. 43-48, and under Section 9 of the Interstate Commerce Act, U.S.C.A., title 49, sec. 9.
For…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Graves v. New York Ex Rel. O'KeefeSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Horowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Lord v. VeazieSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. ICCSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- in all Winstar-Related Cases at the Court v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- United States v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1950
- Ishverlal Madanlal & Co. v. SS Vishva MangalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.